PG PLT Meeting 10/28/15

We looked at data and decided who should be referred to RtI.

We discussed Unit 4 timelines. We realized that some students are lacking in the prerequisite material needed for unit 4. So some websites were shared to help differentiate for those students.

Also, a teacher demonstrated how Kahoot.it can be used for formative assessments in class.

We discussed further how to best assess Common Core Practice Standard 3.

PG PLT Meeting 10/21/15

We discussed RtI procedures. How best to record data, especially if a student fails a retake. We will not use the "Exit Date" column in the intervention instrument. Instead we will use other correspondence.

We discussed timelines. Everyone is still on track to test Unit 3 by the end of the week. We will decide who to assign to RtI at our meeting next week.

PG PLT Meeting 10/14/15

We discussed how students are doing in RtI.

We discussed timelines for unit 3. All teachers should be ready to assess by the end of next week.

We discussed how to assess Common Core Practice Standard 3. We looked for a topic the students knew the content, so we could focus on their ability to construct viable arguments. It was suggested that we use a question involving determined if lines cut by a transversal are parallel. We will continue to discuss how best to assess this.

We looked at the first semester exam to see which questions fit which standard so we can use it as a post assessment.

PG PLT Meeting 10/7/15

We discussed how RtI is going for unit 1.

We looked at data to determine who should be referred to RtI for unit 2.